Measuring Intelligence

Specialized School
Exams Criticized
Henry J. Stern is the founder and president of New York Civic.
Monday, October 8th, 2012

The  NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund filed a complaint with the US Department of Education on September 27. They objected to the written test, known as the Specialized High School Admissions Test, which the city uses to select students who will attend eight highly regarded high schools.

Today, The Wall Street Journal reported on the adoption of a change to a test used as a part of the admissions process for the city’s gifted and talented program for students from kindergarten through third grade.

These are complex issues and we intend to be involved in the public discussion of this subject. We start by recounting the experience of this blogger when he first encountered the Board Of Education and its procedures for sorting students.

This subject is of particular interest to me because of my own experiences in the New York City school system many years ago.

When I was five years old I was enrolled in kindergarten in our neighborhood school (PS 152, in the Inwood section of Manhattan). At midyear, the children were screened for promotion to the first grade. The teachers found that I could already read and write. They felt there was no point in sending me to the first or second grades in order to learn what I already knew.

The school placed me in what was called the Health Improvement class, which was an early version of Special Ed. The class included obese kids, stutterers and other boys and girls who did not fit the physical norm for various reasons. I was the youngest and smallest boy in the class of about thirty students.

My classmates and I took naps from ll:30am to noon each day. When we completed any written work or answered a lot of problems, we brought our work to the teacher’s desk, and she would read and correct it while we stood there. That was individual instruction, although I did not realize it at the time. After two years, I was transferred to a fifth grade class, under a program called I.G. The teachers told us that the initials stood for Individual Guidance, but we kids knew it really meant Intellectually Gifted. The teachers did not want us to know that and become arrogant.

From then on, I was part of a regular class, which consisted, however, of the best readers in the school. Each grade was divided into six sections, because six times thirty was roughly the number of children in the grade. The sections were numbered from 5-op (for opportunity) through 5-5, the higher class numbers indicating lower scores in reading and math.

In the eighth grade the 5-op name was changed to R.A. for rapid advancement and the class all skipped another semester. After ninth grade I graduated from JHS 52, the local junior high school.

Most of the students in the R.A. class took the test for Bronx Science, Stuyvesant or Brooklyn Tech. Years later my two brothers also passed the Bronx Science test. Science then had predominantly Jewish students. Today, Stuyvesant is 72% Asian. Which school you chose was often a matter of geography; Inwood was at the northern end of Manhattan, and Science was a trolley ride away, across the 207th Street Bridge to Fordham Road, then east to Creston Avenue.

Every day I was given fifty cents by my parents; 22 cents for the school lunch, provided with the help of the US Department of Agriculture; 10 cents for a round trip on the bus; 3 cents for the New York Times and 2 cents for the Daily News. Two modest packages of dried fruit cost 5 cents. This left me about 10 cents for discretionary spending, often 5-cent candy bars.

As I recall sixty-five years later, the teachers were pretty good; some were excellent and nicer than others. The kids in the 5-op class were bright, with some aiming to go to medical or dental schools after college. After the school day ended, the boys usually played softball in the school yard. I didn’t play, partly because of my size and partly because of a lack of eye-hand coordination. I did play ball in front of our five-story apartment house on Post Avenue, where I found other boys and girls who were closer to my size.

My recollections of elementary school are positive. However junior high school was not so good. My problem then was doing homework, which began when we took up long division late in the fourth grade. Until then I could answer any question I was asked in my head, but when it came to moving numbers from one column to another, the added step of writing them down and carrying them over exceeded my limit.

The students were also assigned to write notebooks on a subject we could choose. I selected World War II, and wrote compositions about major battles and campaigns from the point of view of the Allies. The hardest part of the compositions was writing neatly with a quill pen, which we dipped into an inkwell on the desk. The ink sometimes ran and would always be hard to blot.

A very nice girl named Stephanie Winkler sat at the desk in front of me. She had strawberry blond hair, which I was tempted, from time to time, to dip into the inkwell. I generally resisted that temptation, and I apologize sincerely for those occasions when I did not. Stephanie, wherever you are, please forgive me.

Our classes were formed on what is called homogenous grouping, bringing together children based on their ability to read and write. It worked fine for us, and it made for a lot of bonding between the students. The main chasm was between the boys and the girls, whose seats began on the opposite side of the classroom. Nevertheless, there was general amity and congeniality between the genders, especially as the kids grew up.

I wonder what effect the age gap between my classmates and me had on my school work. My high school grades were above average. By college I had abandoned schoolwork for student government and the college newspaper and my grades suffered. Still, I enjoyed it. I got into law school simply because of my high LSAT score.

This shows how the make-up of a class can be determined by what admission tests are chosen and how they are graded.

As the years pass, my memory of school days grow more positive, and I even feel a lot better about law school than I did at the time.

This alumni euphoria is described by Samuel Woodworth (1784-1842) (not William Wordsworth (1770 – 1850)) who wrote these lines:

“How dear to this heart are the scenes of my childhood,

when fond recollection presents them to view!”


This is the first in a series of articles which will present a variety of opinions on the question of entrance examinations for specialized high schools.

Tags:

Comments

school euphoria

they had LSATs in @1804?

All these fond memories

All these fond memories really do not help in the current context of mass information and multimedia.
The fact that the 'learning' process has not changed in what like 2000 years is mind boggling.
In this and future centuries students sitting in a room and having and adult 'teaching' one topic at at a time is backwards. With the current amount of information ( in any field science / art /etc ) the classroom model needs to change.
So yes I do have fond memories about my HS in a communist country where all education was free. My best memorie are of rebelling at the status quo and printing manifestos.
Im my class there were really gifted students that woudl progress at the same pace with all others. The einsteins where sometimes bored and sometimes not but we had afterschool programs to address that.

Specialized School Exams

If this issue goes the way of some others, I expect the NAACP and its ilk will force the Dept. of Education to revamp the tests (dumb them down), or do away with them altogether to accommodate more black candidates. This type of rhetoric has produced two generations of entitled, underachieving black students.

Your description of your public school education mirrors mine, even though we're separated by -- probably, thirty years. In the early 60's the Rapid Advancement Program came to be called SP for Special Progress. (Not too imaginative when it came to naming these initiatives, but I guess by then they didn't care if we became arrogant.) I chose 2-year and graduated 9th grade at 14. I liked school, liked my classes; most of my teachers were good and a couple were extraordinary. Although students had their own individual schedules, for the most part we went to the same classes as a group, so we were a little insulated, a little clique-y and a little privileged. We got to go on more outside trips - museums, science fairs, cultural attractions. But we worked hard and we produced. We were given more work and had a lot of additional projects in art, science and music. Much was expected of us, and what was given was earned. I was expected to maintain 85% or better average, by both school and parents. I did so out of pride, desire to achieve, fear of failure and for the pure pleasure of excelling - which is a singular sensation that cannot be duplicated by anything else.

It's all very well to want to level the playing field to provide equal opportunity, but in point of fact, there's never a level playing field when it comes to test-taking or other competitions. People are not equally skilled, or equally experienced, or equally smart, and you can't write a test to accommodate the lowest common denonimator, because you wind up with the bottom of the barrel, not the cream of the crop - which, let's face it, is kind of the point of these schools, no? Competition is good; it's healthy, necessary and inevitable. Life isn't fair. These are lessons that are worth learning early and well. It would be most hypocritical to "water down" the entrance requirements just to make these schools more accessible to students who really don't belong there.

Specialized school exams criticized

Response to letter on specialized high schools entry exam
George Zulch (alias “Molar”)

My best memories of education are of the time I was a student at the Bronx High School of Science. I graduated in 1968. I had looked forward to taking the exam and hoped beyond all hopes, to be accepted. This was my dream and goal for several years prior, while in junior high school. Having to pass an entrance exam made it all the more worthwhile and even if the school had been the same without such an exam, there would probably have been no sense of achievement had I just moved on to it without a tough entry exam. In the fifties and sixties competition with a reasonable degree of stress was a healthy and good thing and drove people to excel without crushing them. Special prizes require special preparation along with accepting the inherent challenges. For the City to remove or abase the exam would effectively degrade not only the special schools but the system as a whole. This was once briefly done during the LaGuardia administration from what I gather. Evidently, the mayor at that time, viewed such schools as elitist but fortunately the concept and survival of such schools remained as his tenure passed on.
For me, what was “special” about such a school was a rare blend of excellence in education with ethics. I had gone on to City College from there and finally to Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery; yet as good as those experiences were, they never quite measured up to “Science.” To this day I remember a statement that my sophomore biology teacher, Milton Kopelman, made when the time came to dissect frogs; “Remember that the frog before you, although dead, was once a living creature,” to paraphrase. That would stay with me through my entire education and gave me a serene perspective when dissecting a human cadaver in anatomy class, at Columbia. It was the single most significant statement anyone had ever made in my education, and yet how simple it was.
I want to see the privilege and the gift of “Science” and other specialized high schools continue, and that means keeping a competitive entrance exam and meeting those kids as they walk in the door with teachers who themselves have gone beyond the grade.

Measuring Intelligence

I attended P. S. 6 in Manhattan from kindergarten through sixth grade, and I recall we had a pretty diverse group intellectually until about 5th grade, when we were divided into I.G. classes and standard classes. Neither of my parents had much formal education...my father had dropped out of George Washington High School in Washington Heights primarily for economic reasons, so he could perform in vaudeville. His mother had also dropped out of school when she was about 15 years old so she could go on the stage. I had learned to read by about first grade, mostly because I enjoyed reading the Sunday comics, and found my class's very tedious, slow progress going through the Alice and Jerry primer painfully boring. We all had to read as slowly as the very slowest kid in the class, and we did have some developmentally disabled students.

I couldn't believe we would have to spend all year reading a very moronic book with Alice and Jerry repeating phrases like "Run, Jerry, Run. Look, Alice, Look." I used to look out the window to pass the time, watching the funerals across the street at Frank E. Campbells...which was much more interesting than the slow progress of our class.

I think tracking is useful so that faster students don't have to be burdened with being bored and having their intellects held back. If we are to be a meritocracy, those who are smarter, faster, better, should be able to rise to the top, regardless of race or faith. Many Asian students seem to excell in math and science, for a number of reasons, mostly cultural. We shouldn't have quotas on those who excell, and force schools to decide that all races must be equally represented in all classes in equal proportions to their numerical proportions. All should be given equal opportunities and as much help and instruction as possible...but it isn't fair to the bright stidents to make them go as slowly as the slowest student in school.

I'm told that new studies

I'm told that new studies show that the Asian script is what gives some Asian students, not all, a leg up in math. Math beyond simple arithmetic involves shorthand notation represented by symbols. As I understand, the Chinese and Hebrew alphabet have embedded meanings separately as well as a meaning when strung together.

Like water, students will find their own level. As a society we should support them at their individual levels so they may have opportunities to succeed.

Specialized school exams criticized

Response to letter on specialized high schools entry exam
George Zulch

My best memories of education are of my time at the Bronx High School of Science. I graduated from there in 1968. I had looked forward to taking the exam and hoped beyond all hopes, to be accepted. This was my dream and goal for several years prior, while in junior high school. Having to pass an entrance exam made it all the more worthwhile and even if the school had been the same it would not have had nearly as much meaning if I had just moved on to it without a tough entry exam. In the fifties and sixties competition with a reasonable amount of stress was a healthy and good thing and drove people to excel without crushing them. Special prizes require special preparation and accepting the inherent challenges. For the City to remove or abase the exam would effectively degrade not only the special schools but the system as a whole. It was once briefly done during the LaGuardia administration from what I gather. Evidently, the mayor at that time, viewed such schools as elitist but fortunately the concept and survival of such schools remained as his tenure passed on.
For me, what was “special” about such a school was a rare blend of excellence in education with ethics. I had gone on to City College from there and finally to Columbia University School of Dental and Oral Surgery; yet as good as those experiences were, they never quite measured up to “Science.” To this day I remember a statement that my sophomore biology teacher, Milton Kopelman, made when the time came to dissect frogs; “Remember that the frog before you, although dead, was once a living creature,” to paraphrase. That would stay with me through my entire education and gave me a serene perspective when dissecting a human cadaver in anatomy class, at Columbia. It was the single most significant statement anyone had ever made in my education, and yet how simple it was.
I want to see the privilege and the gift of “Science” and other specialized high schools continue, and that means keeping a competitive entrance exam and meeting those kids as they walk in the door with teachers who themselves have gone beyond the grade.

Testing for High School

The case for homogeneous grouping is that it is better for the students.

In the extreme alternative, imagine a physics class with a mixture of Einsteins and idiots. Either you waste the time of the Einsteins or the idiots haven't a clue what is being taught. What is the case for that?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. PLEASE MAKE SURE TO SAVE YOUR COMMENT ELSEWHERE OR OPEN A NEW WINDOW. THE FORM WILL NOT RETAIN DATA IF YOU LEAVE THIS PAGE!!!
Fill in the blank